Wednesday, 29 April 2015

Analysing UFO Photo from friend in Canda

I received some photo files from friend in Canada on 21 April 2015 01:34 of photos claimed to be of a UFO that had been hovering overhead. I am uncertain to the exact date and time of when the photos were taken, since the meta data is not consistent, and when they get downloaded from the email, the computer sets the date, and attaches the date to the images on the day they had been downloaded.
Since the time I got the photos relate to the time of when this happened.

I don't know if it is the date on the camera that is imprinted onto the photos is correct (since when I used to have a digital camera, i never bothered in editing the correct date n the settings, which is why I like the iPhone, everything is done for you).




I would have to have a confirmation from him that the date the photos were taken were the same as the date printed on the photos.





The photos were not taken with a steady hand, as you can see the movement of the camera had been captured , casing blurriness and distortion, and the light source of the object and other light sources produce matching patterns, which further indicates the object in the sky was stationary, but the camera was moving, while taking the shots.


Is the object in the sky venus ? from enhancing the hue/lightness/saturation and gamma correction, to see if there are any stars that had been captured does indicate that the object was rather bright and larger than a star or planet such as venus,  such as this Venus-Jupiter example.

but it does not rule out the possibility of it being venus, but it appears to be too bright , when plotting it against the light pollution in the area.

The photos are not good quality at all, since when enhancing them, they appear to be JPG compress in the old school way, and are a low definition and you see squares and pixilation.

So what is my conclusion, well first off things always look better IRL than on camera , the quality of the photos are shit, due to the camera's quality and the photos were not taken with a steady hand, but the relative size of the object is larger than venus or jupiter would be in the night sky, so it has a better probability of being a visit from extraterrestrials.
I had to use my blog here, since tumblr has disabled a lot of useful features in adding text, images and video in one blog article. :( don't mention the annoying flat design as well, which I despise.

Upon uploading the photo's google managed to animate the flight path.... wow..


No comments:

Post a Comment